Media
The Film Industry Introduction questions
1) In the UK
film market, an increase in the number of screens available to show films has
not led to an increase in the number of films being shown. Why?
The fact that the number of screens available to show films has increased has not led to an
increase in the number of films being shown because although some people may
think more screens opens up the opportunity for more films, the same major
films are in fact played at different times of day, and repeated for how ever
long they stay in the cinemas for.
2) In your
opinion what might account for the fact that cinema attendances have fluctuated
between 139 million and 176 million between 1999 and 2008?
In 2002, ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers’ was
released. The gross of this film was £91,914,687, which is huge. This is partly
because it was the sequel to an unbelievably successful film, which guaranteed
it a subsequently large audience.
3) In 2011, UK
film distributors invested £330 million in advertising their new releases and
on 35mm film prints. If around 450 new films receive a theatrical release in
the UK every year, how much, on average, do distributors spend distributing a
film in the UK?
0.7 million
4) This spending
stirred up enormous demand – 171.5 million cinema tickets were bought UK in
2011. This is great news for cinemas – what’s the downside of all this
excitement generated and consumer demand for film PRODUCERS in the UK?
America is a lot bigger than the UK, and the advantage of
British films generally being in a language most countries are able to
understand (English) is obviously also current in America as they speak
English. This means that when there is a ‘boom’ in the amount of cinemagoers
and people seeing films, America profits also. America can afford to produce
more films, which attracts a larger global audience. This results in the UK’s
film consumption market generally being dominated by US companies and films.
5) In 2004, the
average cost of releasing a US film domestically was $39m, in addition to the
average production cost of $63.8m, making an overall average
production/distribution cost per film of $102.8m. What effect might this have
on Hollywood production and distribution if these increases have continued?
It could cause the Hollywood production and distribution to
decrease because of too high a profit, which would result in less Hollywood
films being made.
6) Why are more
‘middle aged’ people going to the cinema in 2011? Who, in your opinion, are the
current most bankable leading actors for the ‘youth’ market in the UK?
More ‘middle aged’ people could be going to the cinema in
2011 because of the age of the starring actors/actresses in the films. Usually
an older audience is attracted to older actors.
7) How many of the top 10 films in the US last year made
two-and-a-half times their budget?
‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1’
‘The Hangover Part 11’
‘Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol’
‘Cars 2’
‘Thor’
Only 5/10 films.
8) Jerry Bruckheimer is still producing films today – find
some of their recent films he’s produced and look at the trailers. Is he still
a ‘high concept’ producer? Michael Bay has taken over his mantle as the go-to
man for the ‘event’ movie. Watch some of the trailers for his recent films –
does he deserve his reputation for films that are high on effects and low on
narrative?
In my opinion, Jerry Bruckheimer is still a ‘high concept’
producer. Although, having said this
Q9) find some ‘indiewood’ type films –
ones associated with a certain ‘art house’ feel yet connected to a big
Hollywood studio – that these companies have produced. Who are their films
aimed at?
Fox searchlight pictures – ‘beast of the
southern wild’ is aimed at children
-‘The sessions’ is aimed at middle aged
people/ adults
Paramount pictures – ‘200 cigarettes’ – aimed at adults
-
‘an inconvenient truth’ – documentary, aimed at
middle aged people/adults
Sony pictures
classics – ‘where do we go now’ aimed at adults
-
‘smashed’ – aimed at young adults
Focus features – promised land
Q10) to what extent
does Hollywood dominate the UK film landscape
How has it
managed to retain its stranglehold?
Hollywood does dominate the UK film landscape to a large
extent. It seems that high budget Hollywood blockbusters are the most popular
films in the UK by far. Also, they are generally the types of films that end up
in major cinemas. This results in them being shown widely to the UK’s cinema
audiences, and spreading throughout the UK. The idea of ‘herd mentality’ also
comes into play here, people follow the crowd and follow what other people deem
to be good, hence the phenomena amount of popularity of Hollywood films
receive.
Although there is a large market for indie looking films,
there is also the ‘indiewood’ genre, which is Hollywood making indie-like film.
This is an example of just how much Hollywood has taken over the film industry,
it seems to cover almost every genre of film, and make more money out of it
than independent film companies or film makers with less money.
Hollywood has managed to retain its stranglehold, because of
how popular it is. The popularity automatically means the Hollywood films make
more money, which results in more and more films can be afforded to be churned
out.
No comments:
Post a Comment